OMG UPDATE: Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter to get updates on updates!

Updated on Sunday, February 14

#23585

OMG:

To the guy from Bomber Wednesday who grabbed my hand and forced me to dance and told me he "knew my type," when I said I didn't want to dance and wanted to go home, FUCK YOU. You're a cheap scumbag.
 

95 comments

  1. honestly you sound like a cunt, you're lucky a guy approached you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. fuck you you rapist

      Delete
    2. confirmed entitled cunt with a potty mouth. This generation of women doesn't deserve any effort. Men should just stop approaching girls and let them beg for it.

      Delete
    3. Definitely agree with 1b. I'd love to see the reaction to lack of men approaching women, but then wouldn't feminists just find another reason to blame us?

      Delete
    4. 1b and 1c have the right idea. As for feminists, they will blame you regardless. Remember, they are fucked up enough to believe that rape occurs at the same frequency on university campuses as the Congo. Women are not worth it, period.

      Delete
    5. So treated "better than the Congo" is the standard a UW girl should be satisfied with? STFU otherwise?

      Delete
    6. WTF, how are you guys blaming this on the girl? You're supposed to ask someone to dance, not grab them. Doesn't really matter what she was wearing. People dress up for a night out. Doesn't necessarily imply slutty behaviour.

      Plus even if she is a slut, that doesn't mean she'd go home with any random guy.

      Delete
    7. 1e. Pretty much yeah. Women these days are not satisfied with anything, period. Canada is one of the safest countries in the world and these cunts act like the men here are depraved third world war lords.

      If the women in this country think this negatively of the men, don't fucking interact with them is my motto. So yeah, one of the safest countries in the world isn't good enough for the women? They sure can STFU.

      Delete
    8. @1a

      > """""RAPIST"""""

      Someone please reassure me that taking a girl's hands and inviting her to dance is not considered "rape". Please tell me we haven't reached this level of retardation as a society.

      Delete
    9. does this have anything to do with Canada Goose?

      Delete
    10. LOL at all the guys above who think women will go crazy and beg for it if they're not being approached by these douchebags. Tbh it would be a relief to not be constantly approached by all the creeps who think they deserve attention.

      Delete
    11. Well, have you blatantly ignored a woman because she was doing something purely stupid or because she causing a scene since she wasn't getting her way? They behave like children in all honesty...you need to make decisions for them on their behalf for their best interest. It's pretty apparent that ladies are heavily dependent on acceptance by others, otherwise these terms such as BBW or plus size models would exist for both sexes instead of just one, for example. We don't deserve the attention or anything at all...the truly smart ones amongst us avoid women in general unless we absolutely need to interact with them, which is pretty apparent by the posts above if you haven't figured it out already.

      Delete
    12. @1j. Are you fucking blind? You make it seem like women are still some prize or something to covet. From what I read above these guys are done with women entirely. Does that really bother your fragile little ego so much? Don't get approached by them then. More and more men are DONE with women. Is that really so difficult to comprehend?

      Delete
    13. @ 1.l Don't get approached by them then? As if women can control who comes up to them, and fyi more and more women are done with men too as you can see by what the OP said. Are you fucking blind? It seems like what 1.j said bothered your fragile ego. I'm sensing someone got rejected. 1.j is not saying women are a prize, they're saying men are not a prize, and not getting attention from a guy won't drive them insane. You're not a woman, so you've never had an experience with a guy giving you unwanted attention and just being creepy and too persistent when you've already said no. No means no, it doesn't mean keep trying.

      Delete
    14. What the fuck does done with women mean? Are all these guys suddenly turning gay?

      Delete
    15. ^ No. It means women are not worth the time, money and emotional energy and there is more to life than perpetually chasing them. In the long run, they will come to you anyway because they need you more than you need them ;)

      Delete
    16. The problem isn't "women." It's angry silly girl snowflakes who've been coddled all their life and expect to get their own way all the time. Go for women who are actually mature. It's like night and day.

      Delete
    17. 1p, so a "coddled" experience, and expecting "getting their own way" include people accepting her "No" when she's approached?

      Delete
    18. Did she specifically say no to this person or are you making up the story to suit your agenda? Victim culture only goes so far.

      Delete
    19. @ 1m
      Actually a woman can control who approaches them. Simply limit your interaction with people by you know staying at home more often, keeping your head down, and/or not socializing. You avoid more people and hence limit the number of those who approach you. I don't know what's so difficult about that.

      Also, nowhere in OP's original post was there any mention of being DONE with men. She was COMPLAINING about them, you know like women ALWAYS do. Your reading comprehension skills are quite lacking.

      Oh and the whole attention thing. If women were fine with not getting attention well why in the fucking hell did OP POST THIS in the first place? Keeping quiet is a GREAT way to not get attention. You should try it sometime, seriously it works WONDERS. After all this post seems to have brought out the so called "creepy men" that you like to spit on so much and who you DON'T want attention from. Seems counterproductive don't you think? So using something I call logic (what you seem utterly devoid of btw) it would make sense to, oh I don't know forget about the event and move on? Yet OP felt the DIRE NEED to post this on OMGUW? Sounds like attention seeking to me. The contradictions in your post are so glaring it's laughable.

      Delete
    20. 1s, where to start with you?
      -the context for approach is when she's out at a place like the Bomber
      -for much of your post, read 14a, though 1m did well
      -"ALWAYS do", generalize much? And the prevalence of complaints don't make them less valid
      -posting a complaint here is different from physical and unwanted attention in person
      -"forget about the event and move on", without telling the community, your advice would have no chance to stop guys from repeating. Maybe OP posting here allows OP to forget and move on, since we'll remember for her, and help reduce this
      -"dire need", have you looked at the range of what people submit as omg's?
      -"sounds like attention seeking to me", again, context. At the club, his in person attention was unwanted, she told him, he didn't stop. Here, OP anonymously calls that out. It's not the same at all.

      Delete
    21. 1s, there's nothing inherently contradictory about wanting to go out, socialize with friends, and have a good time, but not wanting that time to be ruined by assholes who don't respect your boundaries or see you as a person.

      "Take responsibility for the behaviour of complete strangers by foregoing your perfectly reasonable emotional needs" is a very strange argument to make.

      Delete
    22. #notallmen
      #notallwomen

      /thread

      Delete
    23. @1.s someone has too much time on their hands. Your post is like a fucking essay.

      Delete
    24. @ 1u
      No one is saying take responsibility for complete strangers. However you ARE responsible for your own self. Bars and clubs tend to be a congregation of many types of people. And you have to assume those risks. No one is telling you to be responsible for thieves yet I'm willing to bet the vast majority of people lock their front doors when they leave their house. Also you're telling me that the ONLY way to meet social needs is to go to a bar or a club?

      Delete
    25. Blind here: i like the holding hands part

      Delete
    26. @1.x Difference is if someone forgot to lock their front door and all their shit gets stolen, then complained about it people would sympathize instead of berating them. Not only that, it's still a crime even if the front door is unlocked.

      Delete
    27. 1z, there's this Chinese saying, "if the front door is locked, take the back door"

      Delete
    28. 1j +100000
      I can't believe how deluded some of the guys in this thread are. I would be the world's happiest camper if it was socially agreed upon that all guys would just stop approaching random girls in hopes of getting laid. I already do the "approaching" myself if I'm interested, and it's only going to be people I already know well.

      The only thing that would change is no more creeps with no boundaries or social skills being rude and presumptive like in the OP. What a wonderful world it would be if all the bitter whiners ITT actually started to get the picture and keep to themselves instead of acting like their insulting approach is a gift to women.

      Delete
  2. Forced you to dance... mhmm...

    ReplyDelete
  3. OP sounds like a huge fucking cunt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OP I support you.

      Delete
    2. I also support OP.

      Delete
    3. OP, we're with you.

      Delete
  4. So she's not supposed to be able to say no?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow. The Bomber seems to be full of assholes lately. Ugh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isn't it what you want though? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_Q-SdYQq2A

      Delete
  6. Haha, wow I just can't believe it. This poor girl got raped from having her hand touched! Completely unacceptable behaviour!

    Again, perhaps if you didn't lead on so many students, all of these men wouldn't be touching your filthy, disgusting, nasty little pig hand. Personally, I'd never dirty my own clean, beautiful, sexy hands on your nasty shit.

    He knew your type alright, the filthy, nasty slut-type. You fit the archetype completely well and you should be completely and utterly proud of yourself for the work you've accomplished =)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Curious, what's your career plan? Leader, mentor, HR, or just an all-around pillar of society? Maybe someday we'll all read what you've accomplished.

      Delete
    2. Lol 7.a seems like a huge bitch. I'm sure we'll never read about what 7.a accomplishes.

      Delete
    3. 7b as I'm a guy I take it as a badge that you sir consider me that. Sadly we may well read 7's deeds on a police blotter, so I agree we'll likely not see mine there.

      Delete
    4. I bet you're one of those guys who gets angry for being rejected/ignored by the opposite sex. You sound pathetic and disgusting. Learn to respect others and maybe girls would actually bother to look twice at you.

      Delete
    5. 7d, oh you are so fully off-base. But you said the magic word! Respect. Get closer, respect more. Always her choice. Never angry she exerts it. And I respect you. But what I'm learning from you may not be what you intend.

      Delete
  7. I'm laughing at all these angry comments. Looks like OP talking about rejecting a guy is hitting a bit to close to home.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah because it's not enough to "reject" a guy nowadays, you must also shame him for making efforts, insult him, call him a scumbag and a creep, laugh about him behin his back and post his name on the Internet.

      But who cares, he's just a guy. He's disposable. There are thousands of guys who will kiss your feet because you have a vagina.

      Delete
    2. Hey 8a, ignore 8. The most typical method to try and deter a logically superior argument is ad hominem. Dismissing everyone as angry is the only way 8's brain can create some semblance of an 'argument'.


      Don't waste your time with this cunt of a female generation. They deserve nothing positive from you. In fact, your post indicates that you're already beyond their control.

      Delete
    3. 8.a you are my hero

      Delete
    4. 8.a: The hero that men need, but the one most of us are too blind to see or too caught up in feminism/SJWing/white knighting to appreciate haha

      Delete
    5. How are you guys enjoying the anger phase?

      Delete
  8. So many neckbeard sperglords in here, angrily pounding the keyboard with their sausage fingers, enraged that no woman will touch them. It's not their fault, you see! They're such NICE GUYS! If only these cuntsluts would see how very NICE they are! What woman wouldn't want to watch them play Starcraft in their mother's dark basement for hours on end?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Found the angry lesbian.

      Delete
    2. 9.a struck the nail on the head.

      Delete
    3. 9, you're spot on. 9a and 9b, what the fuck does being a lesbian have to do with anything?

      Delete
  9. OP while that is an unwanted advance it is not rape. Claiming it is trivializes real rape. This is why no one takes shit seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nowhere in OP's statement were they insinuating that it was rape. God forbid a person be upset about being dragged into a situation when they clearly don't want to and said no.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You're all being ridiculous. The guy was clearly a jerk. OP was expressing annoyance at being grabbed and then insulted by an asshole. That's all there is to this.

    Before you grab someone and make them dance with you, ask first.
    If they say they don't want to dance, then say "okay," and don't dance with them.
    If they say they aren't into it and just want to go home, say "okay" and let them go home. Go do your own thing.

    Why is this complicated? It's just common sense, and is true regardless of the genders of the parties involved.

    TL;DR Don't be a dick.

    ReplyDelete
  12. can't wait for all of these dudes bashing the girl to have daughters of their own

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. implying these douche neckbeards will ever reproduce hahahahahaha they'll just keep wanking on the redpill and Roosh V podcasts until they die sad and alone and it will be a great thing for humanity's gene pool.

      Delete
  13. Guy came on too hard, girl overreacted.

    No one forced you to dance. Assuming you didn't give him a glance or gave other body language to make it look like you had any interest in him, then yeah, it could have been unwarranted and kinda creepy. But come on now, you can't seriously expect that EVERYONE there isn't going to be creepy. There's one in every crowd. And you could have said no (yes, just a flat out no, blatantly) and if he persisted, then remove yourself from the situation, or go tell a bouncer. Shit happens, fucked up your night.

    What I'm getting out of this is that you said "I don't want to dance, I want to go home" to his guy and he probably thought you wanted to take him home (or some shit like that I dunno). He probably took that the wrong way.

    TL;DR He could have came on too strong, but you're making a big deal about nothing which happens all the time. It's not a "guys are pigs" or "women of this generation are cunts" it's just people can be very off-putting by how they interact with other people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A person shouldn't have to remove themselves from a place like the Bombshelter, because of someone else misbehaving. Or not go out at all since your assumption is there's one in every crowd. Who I guess from your logic does not have the onus to correct their actions. So he (or the assumption that he exists in each crowd) gets to spoil it for anyone who doesn't want to be subjected to this bad behavior. No. Your argument appears reasonable at one level but it really isn't. Equating their behavior, that they both did something wrong, in your first sentence, is a false comparison. It leads to the wrong answer of what should be done. Her saying no was warranted. His grabbing her after she said no is not. He should change his actions, not her.

      Delete
    2. 14A) You never have to remove yourself from anywhere, what I was trying to explain is that you can either ignore the situation, or be proactive about it. You can either choose to not go out at all, or have the expectation that if you are going to go out, that there will be a small percentage of someone else being belligerent, no matter what the venue is (Phills, Bomber, Mollys). To be somehow shocked that there’s always that one belligerent person in the crowd…personally I think it’s a little naïve, based on personal experience (but that’s just me).

      Yeah it may have been a false comparison, assuming that OP did give this guy a hint that she was interested in him and that she was unsatisfied by the reaction he gave her. However if OP did not give this guy any sort of inclination that she was interested in him, then by all means OP was warranted to say no. I’m not saying that she shouldn’t have said no. In fact OP did, but very subtly, and it was left for a very open interpretation. She should have just said ‘No, I’m not interested; I don’t want to dance with you’.
      However I still think it’s a bit of an over-reaction. You can’t expect to be vague about something and then say ‘well fuck that person because they treated me a way that was unwarranted’. I only say vague because OP said that they were ‘forced to dance’ and instead of saying ‘no’ they said ‘I don’t want to dance, I want to go home’. That can be interpreted in two ways as well, but for then the guy to say ‘I know your type’ is going in a bit too hard. Hence that’s why I say it can be both their fault. Not because OP over-reacted, but because OP was not clear on what they meant.

      But that’s just my POV based on what OP said. Could have been an entirely different ballgame, I didn’t see it unfold in front of me. OP could have actually been taken forcefully to dance, or the guy could have just held her hand. IDK just my 2 cents.

      Delete
    3. 14b, two more cents,
      She has many good options other than ignoring or being proactive. She could respond or report, like OP did.

      You assume she was shocked, which she didn't say. She didn't like it and she told us.

      You seem to allow only narrow options for OP. For example, being required to say exactly the word "no". Many ways could communicate clearly enough. Verbally, facial expression, or body language each can be enough on its own. She could choose from many words and phrases, to communicate she doesn't want something to happen. Her phrasing is clear enough that I get the message.

      So what if you assume there'd be belligerent people? A person can still tell others what happened. It's fine to.
      It's a big difference between assuming a belligerent person may be at a venue (who we may never interact with), and them grabbing you.

      Agreed none of us saw it but OP. I don't know what he meant by "knew my type". My guess is he meant he heard her words of refusal, but chose to interpret that she didn't mean it.

      Delete
    4. 14C) Report and respond are two very good options, I agree. I mean OP could have used body language, but even sometimes that can be misinterpreted. Phrasing could have been clear in this context (i.e. as OP told us what a 'scumbag' the guy was, I get the context here) but in the context from the guys point of view could have been the exact opposite. Sometimes it's phrasing and timing. That's why I suggested just saying 'no' instead of vaguely saying what OP said. Guessing from OP's response they seemed shocked (or just really rattled, i'd be too if someone just did that to me). But that's just how i'm perceiving how OP is reacting.

      Of course other phrases can be said too. As for belligerent people, I know, you can report it. And that's always good too. And I understand, thinking to yourself that there's going to always be that one person at a venue, and interacting with them is a whole different scenario. It's happened many times before. And it sucks.

      I don't know what the guy meant either (if he was implying she was playing 'had to get' or he interpreted it as 'why don't you come over').

      TL;DR shit happens and its shitty I guess. But you shouldn't let it deter you from going out again.

      Delete
    5. 14d, 14c here. Good talk. Thanks.

      Delete
  14. Damn... Tf is wrong with our school the guys in these comments seem sour af

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is seriously concerning. o_o

      Delete
    2. Re "Tf is wrong with out school", and "seriously concerning". The school doesn't care (and neither do the guys). It only cares about its image. To be seen in the best possible light after incidents get noticed. Same at other campuses.

      So they just have a public relations response. Not anything that helps on the ground. Just like the guys who defend. Everything about behavior is only from a public relations perspective.

      That's what I think's wrong with our school.

      Delete
  15. All you salty guys need to accept the fact that most of the girls you approach don't want your self pitying dick and you're not entitled to female attention just because you "made the effort".

    Also, you're not going to meet your fucking soulmate at Phils. Stop acting like cold approaching is the only way to meet women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Guys above are not "salty", sweetie. They are merely stating the fact that they are done with women. Don't want to approach them, don't want to meet them, don't want a fucking soulmate, and don't want to stick their "self pitying dick" inside an aperture that has contained tens if not hundreds of other dicks before. Get over it :)

      Delete
    2. lmfao whatever you say sweetie ;)

      Delete
    3. 16a, sounds good to me. I'm not even affected by any of this but it's nice to know that jaded assholes who don't care enough to put in time and effort are taking themselves off the market. Hell, this could make going out even more pleasant for people who just want to chat and have a good time.

      Delete
  16. As long as women can get laid at the drop of a hat with whomever they want, there is a fucking problem. As long as women have the power to chose their partners and men must constantly strive to meet their stupid standards (physique, social status, extroversion etc.), there is a fucking problem. As long as women are entitled to sexual abundance and we aren't, there is a fucking problem.

    This is the second post by a female ridiculing a guy approaching them I have seen in a week. Like the guys above, I really don't see what is the interest of playing this unbalanced game anymore.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oh my goooood you are so delusional just buy yourself a fleshlight and stfu

      Delete
    2. To quote a woman I respect a lot:

      "Evil requires the sanction of the victim."

      Delete
    3. 8/8 tips fedora

      Delete
    4. Capitalism, bitch, it's a free market. What, you want government regulations to ensure you get fucked regularly?

      If you're gonna stop just fucking stop playing, don't whine about it.

      Delete
    5. 17b, who did she mean as the victim?
      The one who the the act was against and didn't speak out against it? Or the one who allowed himself to behave that way, and in doing so became more evil?

      Delete
  17. If OP found this guy attractive, this thread wouldn't exist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL if only there was a like button for this, eh? I can't like this comment enough. Upvote times a billion.

      Delete
    2. Baiscally this: http://i.imgur.com/Y9R4BWQ.jpg

      Delete
    3. 18a here. EXACTLY hahaha!

      Delete
    4. Sure, appearances matter. But so does character. 18b, if the attractive male in that comic suddenly stated spouting off stuff about how women should really stay indoors at night if they know what's good for them, and how men are inherently better at math and science, most women would lose interest in him immediately. On the flip side, effeminate, nerdy men DO get dates - when they're the sort of people who treat everybody around them like an actual human being, and are actually interesting to be around.

      Delete
    5. In all honesty, I'm not an attractive guy. I'm short and wimpy looking. You wouldn't find me attractive if we met in real life. But that's ok! We can't force people to be attracted to one another. I'm not attracted to fat girls either, and I know it's unfair. I don't want to force anyone to be attracted to me. The point is let's just not be assholes to one another.

      Like, I never see this kind of posts from guys: "ewww, those disgusting landwhales keep hitting on me". But I always see posts from girls about "manlets standing on their tippy toes", "fucking scumbags don't realize I'm out of their league, how dare they", etc. you say you believe in equality but what you truly believe is that we're guys so we should be able to take it.

      Delete
    6. LOL 18e must be the short guy with a persecution complex who keeps posting here. No wonder you're unattractive dude (hint: it's not because you're short, it's because you're beta af)

      Delete
    7. No. That's just what you tell yourself to feel better about being a creepy weirdo. Anybody who says "I know your type" is a loser creep that I want nothing to do with. Coming up to random strangers in hopes of getting laid is slimy enough as it is (LOL at the guys on here who seem to think that it's a desirable thing) without being presumptive and pushy. If the guy was hot, that would just make it even more of a shame that he's such a douche.

      Also, to any guy here saying they're going to stop approaching women, THANK YOU. Please do this. I can't think of a single woman that would be upset by the prospect of being able to walk around like a normal person without being bothered by thirsty strangers. If I like a guy, I'm going to ask him out myself, and it's going to be someone that I already know. Guys no longer approaching girls is pretty much my ideal situation.

      Delete
    8. @18g,

      > creepy weirdo
      > loser creep
      > slimy
      > douche
      > thirsty

      Fuck you, you conceited ugly cunt (your inner ugliness reflects on your outside even if you think of yourself as "hot"). You should be grateful if a man ever looked in your direction because you don't deserve any attention.

      Delete
    9. 18h You: http://previews.123rf.com/images/drx/drx0904/drx090400008/4636250-Old-home-film-projector-running-and-projecting-blank-movie-on-a-screen-with-visible-beam-of-light-Stock-Photo.jpg

      Delete
    10. @18i wow this is ambiguous as fuck. Are you trying to say I'm using projection as a defense mechanism? Are you implying that I represent the patriarchy like an old home film projector? Is that picture a metaphor analogous to Plato's Cave? Please articulate your argument if you have one.

      Delete
    11. 18j, I'm not 18i, but I think it's pretty obvious you're projecting.

      Delete
    12. wtf?
      18.g is clearly the one projecting here

      Delete
  18. @18.e speaking as a short wimpy guy, I don't know what you're talking about. I see guys talking about how disgusting landwhales are both in real life and on omguw all the time. They don't complain about being hit on by them because men still primarily do the hitting on. And manlet seems to be mainly used as an insult by other men.

    ReplyDelete