OMG UPDATE: Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter to get updates on updates!

Updated on Saturday, December 6

#20235

OMG: every dateable guy at this school is either a sleaze or in a LTR already.

55 comments

  1. How can a sleaze be dateable?

    Or have I been going about this all wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess by dateable they meant attractive...

      Delete
  2. On behalf of your intelligence - congratulations, OP, you are completely undateable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. OP you make it sound like its exclusive or... I myself pride myself as a sleaze in a ltr

    ReplyDelete
  4. So every single guy at the school is a sleaze. Must be true. Sorry guys.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How is a sleaze datable you shitbrained cumstain

    ReplyDelete
  6. That's not true. I got to UW and I'm totally dateab... oh wait, ya I am a sleaze. Got me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. O, so you went up to every datable guy on campus and asked them if they were in a long term relationship? <(B.S.) So how many people do you consider datable around campus? Maybe your expectations are too high. Maybe you are ugly, and not just on the inside <(which I surmise from this post)?

    ReplyDelete
  8. What if we are simply occupied by being long-term sleaze?

    OP, I'm getting some narrow parameters to fit into here. You gotta give me more to work with.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's because I'm rarely on campus

    ReplyDelete
  11. OP here: By dateable I mean that they aren't disgusting to look at, aren't awkward af, & can atleast somewhat hold a conversation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're vapid and shallow

      Delete
    2. It's because you're not dateable LOL

      Delete
    3. At first I agreed with you but if your standards are that low then you can probably find many 'dateable' guys who are available.

      Delete
    4. There are plenty of guys that fit your criteria, but I doubt you fit any of theirs.

      Delete
    5. OP your standards are reasonable, and I'm sure a lot of the guys responding are just mad that they aren't confident and socially well adjusted enough to fit these categories. However the fact that you believe you can casually decide there are no good guys who are single out of a population of thousands of students doesn't reflect well on you or how you relate to others. Maybe you should just learn to see clearly, very few people are good at hiding their intentions/feelings in anything besides their words(and even then... lmfao it's like people don't even try).

      Delete
  12. Nah girrrl that ain't true doe

    ReplyDelete
  13. You forgot gay on your list

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They wouldn't be dateable though because they're off the market for women (assuming OPs a woman).

      Delete
    2. @ 13.b
      Anyone's on the market if you're smooth enough

      Delete
  14. this sleaze here supports you becoming a lesbian instead, that's hot too ykno

    ReplyDelete
  15. why are they sleazes? is it because they fucked you and tossed you aside like the self loathing cum dumpster u are? you're in denial, hon. take it from a guy who knows your type. one day you'll realize how much of a shitbag u are for all the nice guys who u didnt give a second look. and how even they wouldnt go near your pussy now, after its been fucked by a thousand guys, guys like me who came in early and knew all u were was an insecure bitch whose hole could be used for temporary pleasure

    ReplyDelete
  16. LOL I fucking love this. Two threads side by side about men/women unable to find dates. Comments are predictable as shit.

    "But Waterloo doesn't have a misogyny problem!! :( OH WAIT LOOK A NEW WOMAN TO HATE"

    Newsflash: most people don't want to date people that aren't well-adjusted, and "not well-adjusted" is how both you and I describe 99% of the Waterloo population. Oh, but you're the 1%, aren't you...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. IM MYSOGYNIST
      YOUR MYSOGYNIST
      HES MYSOGYNIST
      WE'RE ALL MYSOGYNISTS!

      Delete
    2. I noticed this too, but the difference is that the guy who made the post didn't just offhandedly insult the entire female Waterloo population. I would've given him just as much hate if he had.

      Delete
    3. Its not because shes a woman, its because shes a shallow bitch.

      But that will be ignored so you can feel good about your misandry.

      Cunt.

      Delete
    4. Don't you know that you can't say anything negative about a single woman without being misogynistic? God. You insensitive cis male scum.

      Delete
    5. Another thread of victim culture

      Delete
    6. 16b: posts that insult the entire female population on campus ("all girls that go to Waterloo are UGLY") are regularly applauded ("OMG I KNOW THEY'RE ALL FAT UGLY SLURS WHY CAN'T THEY DRESS BETTER FOR ME").

      Appreciate the thought but it doesn't match reality.

      Delete
    7. > your misandry

      c, we can start talking about my "misandry" when you stop your misogynistic namecalling. Cunt? Really? I was expecting you to insult my masculinity, actually, but I guess you'd expect only women to call out this antisocial bullshit.

      The OP defined dateable as "aren't disgusting to look at, aren't awkward af, & can atleast somewhat hold a conversation". These are the *exact* same expectations for women in the whiny "why can't I get a girlfriend, my standards are so low" threads. I don't understand why these are considered reasonable or low standards for men but are "shallow and vapid" for women. Personally, I think they're reasonable for everyone.

      Delete
    8. Wow 16g, sorry I'm such a DICK.

      Stop getting offended on purpose

      Delete
  17. You just aren't meeting them. How do you expect to meet said guy?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Have you tried Tinder?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That only works if you have rules 1 and 2 down:

      1. Be attractive.
      2. Don't be unattractive.

      Delete
  19. tonnes of disgusting comments on this thread... why do you people think like this? Pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'm single, I'm not a sleaze. I probably wouldn't date you with that sort of comment. Look at the ratio of guys to girls at this school. There are obviously single, dateable, non-sleazy guys around. Maybe you should make yourself more dateable than blame others for your problems.

    ReplyDelete
  21. OP, maybe it's you who fits your own criteria:
    - you're disgusting to look at
    - you're awkward as f
    - no one wants to hold conversation with you because u have attitude problems

    ReplyDelete
  22. The replies to this post explain why there are few datable guys at this school. FYI no one want to date an angry, bitter guy.

    ReplyDelete
  23. OP, are you a good girl?

    ReplyDelete
  24. maybe you are just a bitch

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hey MODS.

    I know I sound like a broken record and all, but as long as I can remember, OMGUW has updated daily in the Fall and Winter, and every other day during the Spring. Sometimes it's also every other day between terms and during exams, because of the low volume of submissions.

    So either nobody is using this site anymore and you have basically nothing to post, or you just suck - because these WEEKLY updates you're doing are basically intolerable. Get your shit together, MODS, or hand off the site to somebody new.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1000
      1) we need to post more
      2) MODS need to update more
      3) OMGUW need to advertise more around campus to let people know about this site.

      Delete
    2. I think the reason we don't have as much content lately is precisely because the content is only updated weekly. These mods are going to be the downfall of this whole site.

      Delete
    3. There is more than enough submitted content. When the site is updated there is always a huge glut of posts then nothing for about five to seven days after.

      Delete
    4. I've seen many groups of OMGUW MODS come and go in my time, and this group is by far the worst. We routinely have:

      ->A near-total lack of actual moderation, even in instances where certain people are mentioned/attacked by name;
      ->Inconsistent and infrequent updates;
      ->No sorting of submissions (often things make it to the OMG page that should be in ASK or MCs).

      I'm NOT trying to attack the MODS as people here. I'm sure they're lovely people! But they're clearly not into moderating this site - so they should hand off the job to somebody new.

      Delete
    5. My theory is that this site was a vanity project for someone. It seems that now they're about to graduate, or already have graduated, they don't want to put in the extra effort as it's probably already on their resume. Now the site will die a slow death.

      Delete
    6. 25e, that theory would hold water if this wasn't the third of fourth completely new set of MODS this site has gone through. The founders of the site graduated about a year after setting it up.

      Delete
    7. This is why everyone has migrated to reddit.

      Delete
  26. STFU, GTFO cunt fucker.

    ReplyDelete